En Banc Federal Circuit Reaffirms a Separate Written Description Requirement

Our colleagues Al Jacobs, Trenton Ward, Jihan Jenkins and Puja Patel have written a detailed analysis of the Federal Circuit's highly anticipated en banc decision in Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co., No. 2008-1248 (Fed. Cir. March 22, 2010), which can be found here.   

In Ariad, "the Federal Circuit reaffirmed that patents must satisfy “two separate description requirements: a ‘written description’ [i] of the invention, and [ii] of the manner and process of making and using [the invention].”   The Federal Circuit’s decision is in line with existing recent precedent, but raises questions about the ability of some inventors, particularly universities and research entities, to obtain patents on early stage research."  To read more, click here.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.virginiaiplaw.com/admin/trackback/193058
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.